Good Morning AmeriKa, how are you?
|
Posted By: Average American Posted on: Dec. 21, 2009 at 12:30 PM |
3.0 / 5
Based on 2 ratings.
|
Last night or rather early this morning, a procedural vote set the stage for the biggest rip off in history. It wasn't a train full of gold bound for the city by the bay to be minted into coins, and it wasn't Wall Street manipulating the stock prices to pull billions from Uncle Sam. And believe it or not, it wasn't even the Federal Reserve, who can operate in the darkness without consent of the people or their representatives in Washington.
No folks, it was Washington itself that dealt this one to us, the victims of the biggest heist in history.
While the actual passage of this abomination is yet to officially be presented for the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to sign, it is all but a done deal. Last night the one Democrat I actually thought had some guts caved like a little girl hit in the boob with a fast ball. Senator Nelson, remember that name, placed on display the true cost of freedom and it only cost him $100 million to hand it over; not just his own, but all of ours as well.
For we will be slaves to this system as we are to Medicare and Social Secrewity. We will be slaves to it like we are Welfare and every other "we will do for those who can't (won't)" programs mismanaged by the Federal Government for decades to come. In fact, I am willing to go on the record right now, this very moment in time and I want the entire world to mark these words, "It will cost 10 times what they claim within 30 years". I pray someone calls me on this December 21, 2039, I really do. For at that time I will become the new Nostradamus, but I will still be alive, hopefully, to see it.
Unless, by the shear will of the people, the election cycle of 2010 puts into office real Americans who can strip the teeth from this disaster and return us to some level of normalcy wherein we deal with the actual problems concerning health care costs. That's right, the costs. Remember those, the thing that was originally bantered about as the reason for a need to address this in the federal halls of our once great nation?
As I listened this morning to this pathetic excuse for a leader we currently have to refer to as "president", I heard him go on and on about this being the key to reducing the deficit. How exactly, he would not elaborate upon, as usual. And how exactly will it reduce costs of medical services? Again, the silence was deafening.
So between now and Friday, the day when most Christians celebrate the birth of Christ, we will no doubt be subjected to the usual suspects spinning the usual tripe about how Democrats have once again fought hard and won for the little man. It makes no difference that it is the little man who can least afford the massive tax increases attached to this abortion of a bill. Nor does it matter that they will find themselves even less capable of affording the very coverage that the government itself will now offer; or will in four years.
Nor will it matter that if these tax increases don't finish the little man off, the Cap and Trade legislation, sure to be slated for the next major debate in Congress, certainly will if passed as written. All the way however, you and I will be expected to continue to pick that cotton and pass that money on up to Uncle Sam; the only one who knows how properly to utilize it.
Yet hope burns eternal. Across this nation Tea Parties continue to grow in size and this latest, rather large middle finger to the American people should continue to fuel these gatherings. More and more Americans are seeing with their own eyes how little their opinion after November 2008 really matters. Well it has been said before and I will take this opportunity to say it yet again; elections have consequences.
I hope people keep that in mind as they continue to speak out. I also hope they remember what happened just a few short decades ago when another movement burst upon the scene fueled by discontent with our government. It lead to 8 years of Democratic control of the White House and its leader's name was Ross Perot. And although the GOP wrestled control of Congress from the Democrats in 1994 following the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, which would not have happened had Perot not siphoned millions of votes from George Bush Sr., they did little after the first 100 days with that very power.
In 2010 we are faced with a familiar narrative. The Tea Parties now fill the role made famous by Perot and his Perotiacs. Will we again try to hire people who sound great and whip the lights out of the GOP candidate but fail to capture the seats of power leading to the installation of additional terms for the very people who just rammed us against the wall and rapped us of our future? Or will we be smarter this time and instead of splitting the ticket, force the GOP to put the right people on the ballot so that we can vote with faith that they will represent us as we desire?
While I support the Tea Parties fully in their message, I believe we need to use the existing party and its infrastructure to defeat the Democratic Party next November. A split house of TP, GOP and DEMs will only serve to strengthen the party that handed us this mutation of our constitution.
The time to organize is here, the time to end this madness is here. If we do not, we may find ourselves sharpening out pitchforks and lighting our torches; with much the same effect in the end.
But what would I know; I'm just an Average American.
Comments:
|
Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:51:45 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by June on Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:22:20 PM]
Health Care to Suffer Fate of Welfare, Not Medicare or Social Security
The latest installment of conventional wisdom to emerge from liberal writers who support the current health care bill argues that the best entitlement programs come from bad bills. This caterpillars-into-butterflies narrative boasts Medicare and Social Security as the templates for how this flawed bill could form the cornerstone for single-payer, or something like it. Take, for example, Paul Krugman: Bear in mind also the lessons of history: social insurance programs tend to start out highly imperfect and incomplete, but get better and more comprehensive as the years go by. Thus Social Security originally had huge gaps in coverage -- and a majority of African-Americans, in particular, fell through those gaps. But it was improved over time, and it's now the bedrock of retirement stability for the vast majority of Americans. Yet, what they ignore is that so many entitlement programs enacted by Democrats, even the popular ones, are starved of funding, stripped of their authority, delegated to the states and left to fall by the wayside. Nothing exemplifies this more than the welfare programs enacted under the Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. From the moment of its inception it was slowly defunded and shrunken down only to be killed off - or rather 'reformed' (sound familiar?) - by the big-government ending Bill Clinton. A decade later, facing record unemployment, the federal government is compelled to re-authorize welfare payments to the states to stave of state bankruptcies and mass starvation. And the current health care reform package in the Senate looks far more like a welfare program for the poor than Medicare or Social Security. Whereas Medicare and Social Security make the middle class stakeholders in a government run system, and entirely dependent on that system working properly and delivering results, the current reforms are selective in their effects, largely sidestepping those with employer based insurance. Instead, like welfare, the benefits are exclusive in nature, in this case targeting only those who are barred from the current insurance market, and thereby don't give the middle class a stake in its success. Without bringing these stakeholders into the policy it is far more likely to likely to follow the fate of welfare than Medicare or Social Security as services for the poor always become poor services. With the Medicare buy-in and public option off the table there is no 'entitlement' or 'social insurance' program that can grow and expand. Instead there are subsidies to private insurance for those currently left out which are more likely to shrink over time than grow. For the liberals' argument to hold true, that the bill would get better over time, Congress would have to vote to increase the size of the subsidies at a rate higher the inflation of the price of health insurance. Given that nobody seriously believes this bill to "bend the curve" of costs, those subsidies would have increase greatly year-on-year just to remain at parity. The likely outcome is that the growth in subsidies will fall behind the rising cost of insurance, making health insurance more expensive, more regressive and less progressive as time goes on. Without bringing the middle class into a new entitlement program, the health reform bill is only going to get worse over time, and not better. Let's not fool ourselves, this is as good as its gets. |
||
|
Dec. 21, 2009 at 02:22:48 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by adam on Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:51:45 PM]
adam
Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:51:45 PM Health Care to Suffer Fate of Welfare, Not Medicare or Social Security The latest installment of conventional wisdom to emerge from liberal writers who support the current health care bill argues that the best entitlement programs come from bad bills.... View this Comment
|
||
|
Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:29:10 PM
|
||
| So, AA, who will Americans blame when there is no death panels? Who will they blame when govmint beuurowcrat is between then and their doctor? Who will they blame when they can shop for health insurance on an open market, and be able to compare apples to apples? Who will they blame when their premiums fall, and they no longer have some HMO beuurowcrat telling them no they can't get that procedure, or drug? How will it cost 10 times what they project? I'd think the GOP will do their best to restrain costs on Medicare, and keep the costs down. |
||
|
Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:40:15 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Phaedrus on Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:29:10 PM]
Phaedrus
Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:29:10 PM So, AA, who will Americans blame when there is no death panels? Who will they blame when govmint beuurowcrat is between then and their doctor? Who will they blame when they can shop for health insurance on an open market, and be able to compare apples to... View this Comment who will Americans blame when there is no death panels? Geez phake, Without unlimited monies there WILL be death panels....some Republican hack in the next administration will get to pick and chose how long Aunt Maude gets treated for her old age or what ever ails her. Who will they blame when govmint beuurowcrat is between then and their doctor? Uhh, that would be the 'govmint beuurowcrat' who then gets the blame...........so sue em....if you get their permssion MANDATING is NOT an OPEN MARKET, it is a CORPORATIST MARKET NOTHING in ObamaScare MAKES PREMIUMS FALL, in FACT they WILL INCREASE....Obama already made that deal. And the War on Oilraq was going to cost $60 billion.....
Let's face it.... |
||
|
Dec. 22, 2009 at 09:15:34 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by June on Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:22:20 PM]
One of the things I always look forward to is your disregard for the very real subject matter in these posts. It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside to know that you are similarly disregarding the entire movement that is growing below your feet. I truly believe you to representative fo the left in this country. Thanks June for your consistent lack of response. |
||
|
Dec. 22, 2009 at 09:16:30 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by adam on Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:51:45 PM]
adam
Dec. 21, 2009 at 01:51:45 PM Health Care to Suffer Fate of Welfare, Not Medicare or Social Security The latest installment of conventional wisdom to emerge from liberal writers who support the current health care bill argues that the best entitlement programs come from bad bills.... View this Comment Well Adam, the conventional wisdom is usually wrong. |
||
|
Dec. 22, 2009 at 09:18:16 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Phaedrus on Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:29:10 PM]
Phaedrus
Dec. 21, 2009 at 03:29:10 PM So, AA, who will Americans blame when there is no death panels? Who will they blame when govmint beuurowcrat is between then and their doctor? Who will they blame when they can shop for health insurance on an open market, and be able to compare apples to... View this Comment Well Phadrus, we have four years to prepare for this don't we. And with the tax increases coming four years prior to the system being created I don't know who will afford what. Enjoy your 8% tax increase. |
||
|
Dec. 22, 2009 at 10:54:03 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Dec. 22, 2009 at 09:15:34 AM]
Average American
Dec. 22, 2009 at 09:15:34 AM One of the things I always look forward to is your disregard for the very real subject matter in these posts. It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside to know that you are similarly disregarding the entire movement that is growing below your feet. I... View this Comment |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!



Report Abuse